Technology Graduation Credit

In the last Texas legislative session (81st) HB3 removed the technology credit from the Recommended High School Program (RHSP).  In September, the State Board of Education  (SBOE) met to discuss changing the Minimum High School Program (MHSP) and the Distinguished Achievement Program (DAP) to match the RHSP.   At the end of the meeting in September, the State Board of Education directed TEA to align the MHSP and DAP with the RHSP.  TEA is currently drafting language to this effect that the SBOE will consider at their November 20th meeting.

At the TECSIG (Technology Coordinators Special Interest Group) meeting in Austin last week, TCEA hosted two round-table discussions on this topic. Approximately thirty technology directors participated in these discussions. In the beginning of both meetings it was apparent our initial reaction to the news that a technology credit was no longer required for graduation was perceived by us in one of two ways; legislators either thought high school students entered high school with all the technology skills they needed or worse, technology skills were not important.  Our belief system was being questioned.

As we started to dialogue, however, we began to see that the issue was not so cut and dry.  We discussed that because of funding, most high school students took BCIS. The vast majority of the participants in our meeting felt this course provided skills that these students should have mastered before they entered high school, and that BCIS was not rigorous enough to meet the demands of the job market.  Several questions arose from our discussion. If the result of the requirement for a technology credit for graduation was that most students took a course we didn’t think adequately prepared them, then why would we advocate to reinstate the credit requirement?   But, if we don’t have the requirement, what will happen to these teachers who have worked so hard to gain the certification to teach these courses?  Are the technology applications courses still relevant or do we need to offer different courses that are more aligned with today’s job market?  If technology courses are optional at the high school level, how can high school counselors adequately advise students if the counselors don’t know the student’s technology proficiency level?  What type of emphasis will technology courses receive at school districts that are small and don’t have adequate resources?

As you can see, we had a very lively discussion but we realized we needed to include others in the conversation.  So here we are.  What is your opinion?  Don’t be shy.  Let’s challenge each other.  Let’s make sure that we think this problem through and we come up with a solution that is best for the students of Texas.

Advertisements

About Jennifer Bergland

Director of Government Relations at the Texas Computer Education Association
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Technology Graduation Credit

  1. Maria Nate says:

    Whether or not the technology credit is required for graduation, the skills taught by those classes are still part of the College Readiness TEKS.

  2. renwhy says:

    there is another option other than “legislators either thought high school students entered high school with all the technology skills they needed or worse, technology skills were not important”.
    they may be assuming that we are already integrating all of the necessary tech skills into our core classes, negating the need for a separate tech course. or, they are trying to force the practice of integration by removing the perceived need for tech classes.
    whatever the reason, however, it comes down to the frightening idea that this decision allows the state to remove any inkling of tech funding — because choosing to have a tech program is a local decision and should be funded locally. yikes!

  3. Dirk D Dykstra says:

    The State sets the required classes. However, local school boards can set additional credits and schools can offer exciting courses.

    In our district, we have technology as a priority and the students do not have to be forced into it. Webmastery, multimedia, video tech, digital graphics, and more are very popular classes when taught properly.

    We increased the number of technology instructors and are having no problem filling our classes. Perhaps the Technology Directors can start their dialogue with their own local board to add these requirements, and perhaps more, into the local requirements.

    Good Luck.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s